Posted by: Alasdair | 2 July, 2008

What New Labour has done for Glasgow East

As a by-election looms large on the East side of Glasgow following the resignation of David MarshallI think it’s worthwhile examining just how the people living in the area have been served by Labour.  Remember Labour have held the seat, and it’s pre-boundary change equivilents, since at least 1979 so thay’ve had a good deal of time to make some serious improvements.

Labour on Transport:

Living in East glasgow isn’t easy.  Most of the jobs are low paid and, to be honest, there aren’t actually that many jobs there anymore anyway as most industries are either going, gone or long gone.  If you want to work you need to travel outwith the area in a lot of cases (not all, but alot).  This can mean travelling from one side of the city to the other which isn’t an easy prospect unless yo live at one end of a train line and work at another.

Public tranpsort can be convoluted and disconnected leaving you stranded in undesireable areas, or having to walk miles to get to your destination.  The alterantive is running an expensive car.

Labour’s answer to this has been to maintain percentage of fuel duty at the same level as it would have been when the price of a barrel of oil was $88, of course oil isn’t $88 a barrel anymore … was it ever!  How far can the low paid travel in their cars now anyway?

We might have expected this ‘green tax’ to be ring-fenced for public transport plans and infrastructure … apparently not, so no ’special funding’ there then to help out the hard pressed commuter.

Of course it could be that the new car tax tax rates will provide some more ring fencing for public transport … but I wouldn’t count on it.  What does seem fairly certain is that the new car tax levels will be applied retrospectivally to car manufactured since 2001.

Guess what? that cheap second hand motor you picked up for the work run isn’t looking so cheap anymore is it … but don’t think for a moment there’s going to be a nice big shiney new tram to take you to work.  Not unless you want to move to a specific, and over priced, area of Edninburgh where an expensive and pointless tram will take you somewhere … thanks to Labour’s holyrood wing this time.

Labour on low pay:

Glasgow East is the most impoverished area in Britain, low employment levels supported by low levels of pay.  Labour, using their Westminster clout could easily tackle such issues with progressive taxation and revenues policy, yet instead they abolish the 10p tax rate for income.

Then they get ‘found out’ and the 5.3million people on low incomes effected are ‘unhappy’

Then they put together a ‘rescue package’ which leaves 1.06 million people worse off.

Then instead of reversing the original action they thrash about for a bit coming up with more ways in which to make tax and taxation more convoluted.

Labour on employment:

Labour aren’t the party of the Left they once were.  They are in the pocket of big business and have distanced themselves from the unions.  The only work anyone is likely to be able to get is low paid, low skilled, with no prospect of advancement, probably in the food industry or possibly hospitality … that’s if you don’t just end up in hospital.

Labour on health:

Men in Shettleston die younger than anywhere else in the country. At 63, life expectancy is 14 years less than the national average and comparable with Iraq and some countries in the Third World.

.
.
.

A lot of people are on benefits, living from week to week, relying on convenience foods and eating out of the chippy. Give people jobs and the ability to be masters of their own destinies and they will make healthy decisions about their lives.

Guardian.co.uk

 

Another in the front line is Mary McGregor, an undertaker’s assistant on Shettleston Road. ‘Recently there have been young people who suffered sudden, unexplained deaths,’ she said. ‘But east-enders are east-enders, they take everything in their stride. Maybe that’s part of the problem. They just accept it.’

Guardian.co.uk

Maybe it’s time to stop accepting it.

 

Responses

Hope you don’t mind if I add you to my blog?
Found your blog through the missus/g/f/Boss; you know her so I understand, since she apparently beat you up in school :D

Since we seem to share the same politics and opinions on this, I thought I’d comment.
It appears I’m a wee bit more cynical than you; the people won’t wake up, they won’t do anything, they’re apathetic to the extreme.

It’s sad, but that’s the way it is.
That said, I hope enough of those who do care, and do vote, will vote for the SNP. Not only will it bring us closer to the “Magic 20″ Alex Salmond talked about at this years conference, it’ll also spell the death knoll for Gordon. Rumour has it if they lose Glasgow East (difficult, but possible), then Milliband will challenge him. The year or so of in-fighting will totally destroy any chance of them winning the next UK general, meaning the morons in the South-East of England, those who propped up the She-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named for 12 years, will blithely vote in Just-Call-Me-Dave.
This is actually a good thing. Nothing will boost the possibility of a resounding “YES” in the 2010 referendum (if we can have one) than the thought of years of tory-misrule. And even if it doesn’t, no way will the People vote Labour back into office in the 2011 Scottish general, since they’ll want the SNP to protect them from the Raving-Tory party. Hence within the next 5 years, possibly 2, Scotland will be firmly on the way to independence.

Just my thoughts on the matter :D

Hi Math,

Just for the record, she didn’t beat me up ;)

Interesting thoughts, although I’m inclined to agree that Labour will continue to hold this seat … I’ve said as much elsewhere around the blogosphere and it seems to be the accepted line of thought in regard to the constituency. Still, we live in hope.

Alasdair

Yeah I know about the beating-up thing, t’was a joke that Angel said was “not really funny”. Apparently I’m crap at jokes like that. Sorry.

On the politics thing, apparently the PHI100 guys (made up of politicians from all across the spectrum, not too mention various advisor’s, pundits and broadcasters) thing we might win it; 65% think the SNP will win the seat!
They tend to be fairly on the money these guys, they predicted Salmond for 1st Minister, Boris for London Mayor, so it’ll be making Labour worry a bit.
Apart from all else, Labour might not have the money to fight this campaign. We already know that they’re tapped out cash wise, having trouble paying back loans. Several large donors, probably seeing the way the wind is blowing are not doling out the reddies anymore. And Scottish Labour is even more strapped for cash and have a serious decline in membership, meaning less member subscriptions. And on top of it all, they now have a leadership campaign to fight, which if there is more than one candidate (as seems certain) has to go to all the members, which despite their decreasing number is still a lot of SAE’s to send out. Jeff over at SNPTacticalVoting has the figure at £200,000-£250,000. Nice sum of cash that would otherwise be going on Glasgow East.

And the SNP are coasting along nicely on a handsome war chest. Apparently Tommy Sheridan isn’t standing either, thus meaning the Anti-Labour vote will be solely aimed at the SNP and the Liberals. Yeah. I can see the Liberals making a dent, no really, I can.
And they’re fighting a leadership campaign too so less cash for them to throw at the good burghers of Glasgow East.
All in all, not a bad outlook at all. I have a hunch, just a hunch mind ye, that we may *just* pull it off….

If we don’t it’ll be damned close.

Hi Math,

Don’t worry about the non-jokes … the more you visit, the more willing I am to play up to it ;)

It is going to be close, and we’d hope that the seat can be overturned. I suspect the fact that Labour (should) have a weel kent face standing though will mean that they manage to retain it … the by-election that this might spark in Curran’s Holyrood seat could make good watching though. Assuming she stands from it right enough.

Alasdair

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories