Posted by: Alasdair | 14 March, 2008

american non-election pre-election election

There are only really two ways in which you might not be aware of America’s pre-election non-election election during which candidates who will be standing for president, um, stand to stand for president … of course even if they lose the non-election pre-election election they can still stand anyway, presumably as a rank outside independent with close affiliations to their party.

  1. The first way would require being deceased, which to be honest isn’t great;
  2. Be in a coma, not great either;
  3. I suppose you might be in some sort of prison camp outside of international law, but then that would be three so scrub that.

To be honest I get election fatigue just thinking about it!  Although I’m not actually in America, American, or even have any desire to be either, so what would I care?

I care because if you listen to the BBC you would think that this was the 51st State, they’re giving this non-election pre-election election so much coverage you’d think that we needed to be seriously informed about the candidates, their policies, their financial clout and their preference of bloody tampon … apologies that was vulgar and unnecessary, but honestly, we really really really don’t need to know.  It’s not like we can influence the outcome of this or the election proper.

Despite a couple of e-mails to which they responded:

Its certainly a story that we know most viewers expect us to cover but we accept that deciding the level and detail of coverage is subjective and far from an exact science. As a result we do appreciate your feedback and will bear it in mind as the election progresses.

It was clear from the e-mail that they’ve received a lot of complaints.

Of course they’re still bloody at it though … bringing us all the ‘high drama’ as they no doubt see it, leading the news with it in fact.  For example, on the day of the vote in the house of commons on the so-called Lisbon Treaty (AKA EU Treaty / EU Constitution) it was the American political story that led the news, not the highly controversial and malignant treaty.

Today we’re hearing about some lassie that’s had to resign because she said something to the effect that Obama what’s-his-name has attracted a lot of support because he’s black.  Probably not the brightest thing for someone in politics to say, but no-less true for it.  Of course the same could be said for Hilary “I married a top bloke who likes to sleep around, bu’hey you know my judgement’s just fine … now where’s that nuclear button?” Clinton in so-far as she will have people supporting her just because she’s a man woman.

I think somebody needs to get them there priorities sorted out.  I may not believe in the UK, but I know we’re not part of America. 

Honestly though, it’s driving me mad!

Responses

heeeee. I think that is the first and last time that Geraldine Ferraro has been referred to as a ‘lassie’; over here it’s more like tired old hag’. And even I, the ‘lassie’ who loves politics, is tired of the daily drama and thinks time would be better spent watching ‘Dancing with the Stars’.

what if I prefix it with “silly wee … “, certainly if she is as old and hag like as you suggest then the addition would make the slur all the more appropriate.

I don’t mind saying though that it’s helluva frustrating listening to foreign politics when there are so many important and relevant issues at stake.

Hi A,

Thanks to my association and friendship with the Brit, I’ve been acquainted with the strange phenomenon that you describe, where American politics is given precedence over local affairs in many countries. My knowledge of this, to be clear, in no way should imply that I understand the reasons for it, but only that I’m aware of it. I would note that I am often as frustrated as you seem to be by the lack of information we are presented with about happenings outside the US! FOX News seems to be the best at filling in the information gap with their Around The World In 80 Seconds reports.

This Presidential race, however, is of unusual interest to political junkies like myself, since it is the first one in decades where no incumbent President or Vice President is running. To understand the importance of this, you have to understand that, due to a lack of interest by the general public, our two main political parties have manipulated our laws to the point where it is almost impossible for any third party candidate to win a national election. Thus, for the first time in years and years, we don’t have the chance for a nice safe continuation of what we have gotten used to, and this troubles many people.

As to comas, a couple of weeks ago I had to shut my computer down due to thunder storms moving through the area. Thus, I made the mistake of paying close attention the the 24 hour news channel I had on, slipped into a coma, and lost three or four hours of time. Since then I’ve made a concerted effort to click over to the History Channel every hour or so, just to be safe.

the Grit

Is there an American election going on? When did that happen?

(Joke!)

Hi Grit,

But can you really trust Fox News? It’s often portrayed (not that I’ve seen any of it) as extremely bias not dis-inclined to misrepresent the facts.

I honestly do understand the interest in the political race on your side of the ocean, was it happening hear I’m in no doubt that I’d be blogging about it daily. Even if only to satarise the candidates and generally slag off the entire process as being ‘faux democracy’.

Grit, take your dremmel, take your teleand go to work on the thing … you won’t regret it!

Hi Rosie,

Election? NO, there’s not … it’s not even a leadership contest … it’s a NON-ELECTION! An election would at lest be interesting. Sorry, no. The election wouldn’t be interesting, the outcome and the possible impact on Britain would … maybe?!

;) :lol:

Unfortanetely in holland the news is not much different then what you describe. I’m getting a bit sick off clapping Americans.

And after the elections the president will probally be a grey haired - middle aged man anyway.

Hi Matthijs,

So you think Hillary is going to win?

Hi Rosie,

We haven’t gotten to the elections yet. The last year plus has been spent determining out who will be allowed to stand for President. It’s sort of like foreplay.

Hi A,

FOX News has a bad reputation with our other news agencies, mostly because they DO make an honest effort to be fair and balanced. This makes the others angry as the contrast shows what liberal hacks they are. Of course, one still has to take everything with a grain, or two, of salt.

As to daily mocking of the candidates and our political process, check our blog and you’ll find that I have been making the most of the bounty of material being offered up :) Truly, this year the pickings are so easy that I’m beginning to feel lazy poking our politicians in the eye with a pointed stick. And just think, sigh, it won’t be over until November! So, in typical American tradition, we’ve set another record with a campaign that will take up half the term of the office being battled over. This makes me suspect that the campaign for our 2012 elections will start the moment this year’s winner takes the Oath of Office. With this in mind, I would advise grabbing a few shares of stock when our new 24/7 Election News cable channel goes public.

Wait, wait! I seem to be channeling the spirit of Hillary Clinton at the moment, so allow me to apologize for this nonsense on behalf of the US Government, our general population, and our scientists who figured out how to beam our insanity into your lives in real time.

the Grit

Hi Mathhijs,

I know exactly what you mean ;)

Hi Grit,

To be honest I don’t have huge experience with Fox … not having satelitte tele, or another tele for that matter probably doesn’t help in that regard! But from what (little) I have seen from you tube and the like I’m not sure that honest or balanced are words I would associatte with them. But then, as I say, my experience is somewhat limited - wasn’t that all very diplomatic :lol:

Gladly, we don’t actually require any sort of election contest to find excuses with which to poke our politicos in their collective eyes with pointy sticks. When Wendy Alexander took her position as “Leader of the Labour Group at Holyrood” (that’s her officious title), there was no contest yet she still held hustings and went on a big tour to drum up support!

It’s actually a bit of a miracle that I haven’t done one of my ‘bit thick’ posts on the women … there’s simply too much material to choose from!

Alasdair

Hi A,

Ah, the pointy stick. Is that what drove you to take up wood carving? :)

the Grit

Hi Grit,

Nah, I was just looking to carve a wooden spoon for our southern cousins ;)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_union/7282172.stm

Hi A,

At least you didn’t go off on cricket! :)

the Grit

Hi Grit,

Pah! Cricket! Pointless bloody sport, if ever there was one …

Leave a response

Your response:

Categories